Aeon Nimbus
Aeon Nimbus Research
Markets NYSE · LSE · Tokyo · Frankfurt
Aeon Nimbus Research · London
LiJie
Guo.
View & Download CV
Global markets. Unhedged views.

The world is always mispriced somewhere. Capital follows narratives. Narratives follow power. Most investors read the price. This is about reading what moves it.
12Strategies
5Research categories
100%Transparent
About
The Platform
Aeon Nimbus is an independent macro and equity research platform — publishing market views, thematic deep dives, geopolitical reads, and central bank analysis — alongside formal investment calls, each with entry, stop-loss, position size, and full thesis recorded before the outcome is known. LiJie has also developed proprietary algorithmic strategies across five FX and commodity pairs and seven systematic equity models, combining quantitative signals with macro conviction. Every position, including the losses, is on the record.
Experience
His experience spans the capital structure — from long/short equity and macro at a leading independent fund platform in Spain, to Private Credit and Real Estate at Crandon, Private Equity portfolio management and Strategy & Operations at Santomera Bay's private office in Barcelona, and M&A financial due diligence at PwC. He gained early exposure to Europe's venture ecosystem through SpinLab — the HHL Accelerator — and Antler, the world's most active early-stage VC, in Berlin.
Education
He holds a Triple MSc across emlyon Business School, Politecnico di Milano GSOM, and Bayes Business School, City University of London, and is a CFA Level I candidate.
Current Research
He is currently conducting the Jupiter Asset Management Industry Research Project (London) — investigating equity return predictability across Japanese, US and European markets at Jupiter AM, one of the UK's highest active-share, high-conviction managers (FTSE 250, £51bn AUM). Jointly supervised by an Asset Pricing professor at Bayes Business School, a Systematic Equity Portfolio Manager at Jupiter Asset Management, and a Computational Finance professor at Paris Dauphine. He leads the economic framework, hypothesis construction, and Python implementation of factor models and statistical tests.
Background
Spanish-born and ethnically Chinese, drawn from his first market investment at 18 to the intersection of global macro, technology, emerging markets, and asymmetric risk. Not investment advice.
Education
emlyon Business School
MSc Management PGE
Finance Track
Politecnico di Milano
MSc Quantitative Finance
& FinTech · GSOM
Bayes Business School
MSc Finance
City, University of London
$VNET$10.51−2.3%· SPX5,614+0.29%· US10Y4.69%−2bp· GOLD$3,024+0.6%· VIX21.7−1.8%· WTI$67.82−0.4%· DXY103.4+0.2%· $MELI$2,161+1.2%· COPPER$4.42+1.1%· 2s10s−18bpINVERTED· $VNET$10.51−2.3%· SPX5,614+0.29%· US10Y4.69%−2bp· GOLD$3,024+0.6%· VIX21.7−1.8%· WTI$67.82−0.4%· DXY103.4+0.2%· $MELI$2,161+1.2%· COPPER$4.42+1.1%· 2s10s−18bpINVERTED
01
Track Record

Every call published publicly before the outcome is known — entry, target, stop, and position size. Wins and losses on the record. This is what a fund will ask for.

View record →
02
Research Notes

Macro briefs, equity deep dives, geopolitical reads, and central bank analysis — with full thesis before the outcome is known.

Read latest →
03
Paper Fund

Asset allocation dynamic paper fund — macro regime driven, seven asset classes, +28.4% since inception with 1.31 Sharpe.

View fund →
04
Systematic Strategies

12 fully systematic strategies across equity and FX — momentum, mean-reversion, and macro regime models.

Explore strategies →
05
Quant Tools

DCF, Black-Scholes, Kelly sizing, Monte Carlo, portfolio construction, and factor correlation — live in-browser.

Open toolkit →
Featured Call
Loading live data…
📬
Research Notes
Macro briefs, equity deep dives, and geo/market wraps — published with full thesis before the outcome is known.
Subscribe on Substack →
Quantitative Models
Black-Scholes, Monte Carlo, DCF, portfolio construction, and more — all open-source, all in-browser.
GitHub →
🔗
Connect
Institutional background in L/S equity, private credit, M&A, and venture. Available for collaborations and conversations.
LinkedIn →
Approach
I publish independent research — macro views, equity deep dives, geopolitical analysis — and every formal investment call before the outcome is known, with entry, stop-loss, position size, and full thesis. Every result is recorded publicly. The research is the thinking. The track record is the proof.
Aeon Nimbus Research is an independent research platform. All content is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a solicitation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Past performance is not indicative of future results. LiJie Guo · London · LinkedIn
Published research

Research Notes

Equity deep dives · Macro briefs · Geo/market wraps · Central bank analysis

Date Category Title Read
📬
Subscribe Free
Every note lands in your inbox as published. No spam. Research is always free.
Subscribe on Substack →
📊
Track Record
Every formal call published with entry, target, and full thesis. Wins and losses — all on the record.
View full record →
Interactive Tools
Black-Scholes, DCF, portfolio construction, and more — free, open-source, in-browser tools.
Open toolkit →
Audited performance

Track Record

Every call published publicly before outcome is known. Losses included. Never deleted.

Why this matters: Any analyst can show you winners. The credibility is in publishing every call with position size, stop, and entry — before knowing the outcome — and recording losses with the same transparency as wins. This is what a fund will ask for. Every row here is timestamped on Substack the day it was published.

Total calls
0
Live · tracking
Open
0
Active
Wins
0
Closed profitable
Losses
0
Stopped out
Avg return (closed)
0 closed positions
Hit rate
Closed only
DateTickerDirectionEntryTargetStopSizeHorizonStatusReturnLast PriceROI
Live Portfolio Returns
Active Calls
Open positions
Avg Entry
Equal weight
Avg Return
Per position
Portfolio P&L
Equal-weight sim
equal-weight return across active calls
Loading live prices…
Proprietary Systematic Research · Independently Developed
Systematic FX & Commodities Strategies
Two proprietary rule-based strategies, backtested across a full 12-year market cycle (2013–2025) on 99% real tick data — the highest fidelity available in institutional-grade simulation. Spanning COVID volatility, the 2022–2023 JPY intervention cycle, and multiple rate regimes. Results presented using proportional position sizing (fixed % risk per trade) — the standard institutional methodology, allowing meaningful comparison across AUM levels. Combined sample: 6,071 trades. No discretionary overlay. Methodology proprietary. Full backtest data available to qualified institutional allocators upon request.
6,071
Combined Trades
> 1.8
Both Sharpe Ratios
≥0.90
Both LR Correlations
99%
Real Tick Quality
Trend Following
USD / JPY
Foreign Exchange · Systematic
2.13
Sharpe Ratio
Exceptional
0.90
LR Correlation
Strong
Max DD (Relative)
15.83%
Recovery Factor
9.68×
Win Rate
39.6%
GHPR / Trade
+0.20%
Profit Factor
1.29
Total Trades
3,163
Equity Curve · 2013–2025
Trend-following with 1% proportional risk sizing — scalable and AUM-agnostic. The low win rate is structural in momentum strategies: edge comes from asymmetric payoffs, not frequency. Statistically robust sample. Stress-tested through COVID volatility (2020) and the 2022–2023 JPY intervention cycle.
Proprietary · Compounded
Mean Reversion
XAU / USD
Commodities · Systematic
1.82
Sharpe Ratio
Excellent
0.96
LR Correlation
Exceptional
Max DD (Relative)
15.54%
Recovery Factor
5.86×
Win Rate
51.2%
GHPR / Trade
+0.05%
Profit Factor
1.22
Total Trades
2,908
Equity Curve · 2013–2025
Smoothest equity curve of the two strategies — near-linear compounding confirmed by LR Correlation. Max drawdown less than half that of the USD/JPY strategy, despite identical position sizing. Symmetric win rate profile typical of a mean-reversion edge. Tested across gold’s secular bull (2018–2025) and two Fed tightening cycles.
Proprietary · 99% Real Ticks
Backtested on 99% real tick data (MetaTrader 5), the highest fidelity available in institutional-grade simulation. Results use proportional position sizing (fixed % risk per trade), directly comparable to standard fund performance metrics. Backtested results do not guarantee future performance. Strategies are not offered for public investment. Full methodology, walk-forward analysis, and monthly P&L breakdown available to qualified institutional allocators upon request. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Interactive analyst toolkit

Quant Tools

Every tool a PM or equity research desk expects fluency in — live, free, open to all.

Quant
QM
Quantitative Models
Black-Scholes · Monte Carlo · Bond Analytics · Volatility Engine
Open Tool
Core
VE
Complete Valuation Engine
DCF · WACC/CAPM · 3-way sensitivity · Peer comps · Football field · Reverse DCF
Open Tool
PM Skill
PC
Portfolio Construction
Efficient frontier · Sharpe optimisation · Correlation matrix · Risk attribution
Open Tool
PM Skill
PS
Position Sizing Calculator
Kelly criterion · Fixed fractional · Max drawdown simulation · R-multiple
Open Tool
PM Skill
CA
Cross-Asset Correlation
Macro regime detection · Correlation heatmap · Risk-on / risk-off scoring
Open Tool
Analyst Skill
IS
Investment Idea Screener
Catalyst scoring · Sentiment overlay · EV/EBITDA · FCF yield · Momentum rank
Open Tool
QM
Quantitative Models Original
Aeon Nimbus · Black-Scholes · Monte Carlo · Bond Analytics · Volatility Engine
Quant⬡ GitHub
AEON NIMBUS · ORIGINAL IMPLEMENTATIONS · ALL COMPUTATIONS IN-BROWSER · MATHEMATICALLY VERIFIED
Inputs
Spot Price S
Strike K
Time to Expiry T (yrs)
Volatility σ %
Risk-free Rate r %
Option Type
Results
Option Price
Delta Δ
∂V/∂S
Gamma Γ
∂²V/∂S²
Theta Θ
per calendar day
Vega ν
per 1% vol move
Rho ρ
per 1% rate move
Payoff Diagram — Intrinsic value & option premium vs spot at expiry
Implied Volatility — Newton-Raphson
Market Price
Implied Volatility
GBM Parameters
Spot Price S₀
Annual Drift μ %
Annual Vol σ %
Simulations
Horizon (days)
Simulated Paths — up to 200 displayed · S(t+dt) = S(t)·exp((μ−σ²/2)dt + σ√dt·Z)
Terminal Distribution Statistics
MetricValue
Mean terminal price
Std deviation
5th percentile
Median (50th pct)
95th percentile
P(profit) — above S₀
P(> +20%)
P(< −20%)
Bond Parameters
Face Value ($)
Coupon Rate %
Coupon Frequency
YTM %
Maturity (years)
Accrued days since last cpn
Results
Clean Price
% of face value
Dirty Price
Clean + accrued int.
Macaulay Duration
years
Modified Duration
% price chg / 1% YTM
Convexity
2nd-order rate sensitivity
DV01
$ per 1bp move in YTM
Price–Yield Curve · Tangent line at current YTM shows duration approximation
Cashflow Schedule
PeriodCashflowPV of CFWt (t×PV/P)Cumulative Wt
Parameters
Spot Price
Annualised Vol σ %
Annual Drift μ %
Horizon (days)
Target Price (P(hit))
Volatility Cone — GBM uncertainty bands over time
Terminal Distribution — Log-normal density
Expected Terminal
S₀·e^(μT)
Median Terminal
S₀·e^((μ-σ²/2)T)
P(hit target)
probability S_T ≥ target
1σ range at T
±1 std dev band
Implied Volatility Surface — 5×5 B-S IV heatmap (strike × expiry)
VE
Complete Valuation Engine
DCF · WACC/CAPM · 3-way sensitivity · Peer comps · Football field · Reverse DCF
Core⬡ GitHub
Company
Name
Ticker
Share price ($)
Shares out. (M)
Net debt ($M)
Market cap ($M)
Financials ($M)
Revenue TTM
EBITDA TTM
EBITDA margin %
D&A ($M)
CapEx ($M)
Tax rate %
Growth assumptions
Rev growth Y1 %
Rev growth Y2 %
Rev growth Y3 %
Rev growth Y4 %
EBITDA margin Y5 %
Terminal growth %
Exit EV/EBITDA (x)
CapEx % rev Y5
WACC / CAPM
Risk-free rate %
Equity risk prem %
Beta
Country risk prem %
Cost of debt %
Debt weight %
Risk-free rate (Rf)
US 10Y yield
β × Equity risk prem
Systematic risk component
Country risk premium
EM adjustment
Cost of equity (Ke)
CAPM result: Rf + β×ERP + CRP
Ke × equity weight
Equity contribution to WACC
Kd(AT) × debt weight
Debt contribution to WACC
Capital structure
Equity % / Debt %
WACC
Discount rate used in DCF
Metric ($M)Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5
Click Run Complete Valuation in the Inputs tab first.
PV of FCFs (Y1–Y5)
Discounted at WACC
Terminal value
Exit multiple × Y5 EBITDA
PV of terminal value
TV share of total EV
Enterprise value
PV FCFs + PV TV
Net debt (–)
Subtracted from EV
Equity value
EV minus net debt
Implied share price
Equity value ÷ shares
Upside / downside
vs current price
Run valuation to see reverse DCF analysis — what the current price implies the market is assuming.
Bear case (20%)
WACC +2%, terminal growth −1%
Base case (60%)
Your model assumptions
Bull case (20%)
WACC −1%, terminal growth +0.5%
Expected value (probability-weighted: Bear 20% / Base 60% / Bull 20%)

Each cell shows the implied share price under that WACC and terminal growth combination. Base case highlighted in gold. Green = material upside. Amber = near current. Red = downside.

Run valuation in Inputs tab to generate sensitivity tables.

CompanyEV/EBITDAEV/RevenueFCF YieldRev GrowthEBITDA MarginImplied Price
Run valuation first.
Peer median EV/EBITDA
→ implied price
Peer median EV/Revenue
→ implied price
Multi-method average
DCF + 2 peer methods
DCF vs peer convergence
Alignment check

The football field plots all valuation methods on a single axis. The red line is the current share price. The wider the range of methods above the red line, the more asymmetric the upside.

Run valuation first.

PC
Portfolio Construction
Build a mock fund · P&L attribution · Long/short exposure · Risk budget discipline
PM Skill⬡ GitHub

Build a mock portfolio to demonstrate portfolio-level thinking — the skill that separates analysts from PMs. Add positions below. The tool calculates total exposure, P&L, long/short split, and remaining risk capacity.

TickerEntry $Current $SharesDirP&L
Total market value
Total unrealised P&L
Portfolio return
Long / Short exposure
Add positions and calculate to see risk summary.
Calculate portfolio in the Builder tab first.
Total Capital ($)
Max Single Position %
Max Total Deployed %
TickerDirectionConv.Entry $Target $Stop $Alloc %
Portfolio Simulation Results
Total Capital
Capital Deployed
Remaining Cash
Positions
Expected Gain (target)
Max Loss (all stopped)
Expected Return %
Risk/Reward
Position Breakdown
Psychological & Risk Assessment
Run simulation to see psychological assessment.
PS
Position Sizing Calculator
Kelly Criterion · Fixed-risk (1R) · Conviction-weighted — the skill that separates analysts from PMs
PM Skill⬡ GitHub

How much capital you allocate to each idea is as important as the idea itself. This tool implements three methods used by professional PMs. Full Kelly maximises theoretical log-wealth; modified Kelly (½ or ¼) controls for estimation error. Fixed-risk anchors size to your stop-loss distance. Conviction-weighted blends both.

Kelly Criterion
f* = (p·b − (1−p)) / b
where p = win probability, b = win/loss ratio
Win probability (p)
Win/loss ratio (b)
Portfolio capital ($)
Max position cap %
Fixed-risk method (1R)
Risk $ = Capital × Risk%. Shares = Risk$ ÷ (Entry − Stop)
Portfolio capital ($)
Max risk per trade %
Entry price ($)
Stop-loss price ($)
Target price ($)
Conviction (1–10)
Conviction tier framework
High (8–10): ½ Kelly, cap 8%. Medium (5–7): ¼ Kelly, cap 5%. Low (1–4): Fixed 2%.
Conviction (1–10)
Capital ($)
Win probability
Win/loss ratio
CA
Cross-Asset Correlation & Macro Regime
Correlation matrix · Regime classifier · Regime-driven allocation framework
PM Skill⬡ GitHub

Understanding what actually diversifies your portfolio — and what is merely uncorrelated on average but highly correlated in drawdowns — is the core risk skill of a portfolio manager. During risk-off events, correlations spike toward 1.0 across equities and collapse for UST and gold.

🟥 Strong positive correlation (risk concentration, not diversification) · 🟩 Negative correlation (genuine diversification benefit) · Data: rolling 3Y historical estimates

Enter current macro indicators to classify the regime and see the historically optimal allocation framework for that regime. This is the systematic macro lens that underlies every allocation decision.

2s10s spread (bp)
US 10Y yield %
VIX
ISM Manufacturing PMI
Core CPI YoY %
Unemployment rate %
IS
Investment Idea Screener
Thesis quality · Non-consensus signal · Catalyst timing · Publishability score
Analyst Skill⬡ GitHub

Before spending 10 hours building a model, stress-test the idea against the questions every PM will ask. The best analysts filter ruthlessly before committing time. This tool forces the six questions that distinguish a publishable idea from wishful thinking.

Ticker
Direction
What is the market missing? (the mispricing in 1–2 sentences)
Primary catalyst and timing
What makes you wrong? (invalidation condition)
Conviction level (1–10)
Is the thesis genuinely non-consensus?
Is the primary catalyst within 6 months?
Is the stock sufficiently liquid to exit quickly?
Upside / downside ratio (estimated)
Does the fundamental model confirm the thesis?
Has this idea been pitched to a critical audience?
Aeon Nimbus Research · Quantitative Finance
Quantitative Finance Models
View on GitHub
Original browser-native implementations of quantitative finance models — Black-Scholes, Monte Carlo simulation, stochastic volatility, and fixed-income analytics. All computations run client-side in JavaScript with no external dependencies.
Aeon Nimbus Research · Original implementations · MIT-compatible · All computations in-browser
Launch →
𝒩
Black-Scholes Pricer
European call & put pricing with full Greeks — Delta, Gamma, Vega, Theta, Rho — via closed-form formula.
OptionsGreeksBlack-Scholes
Launch →
🎲
Monte Carlo Options
Exotic option pricing via simulation — Vanilla, Binary, Barrier, Asian. Payoff distribution chart included.
Monte CarloExoticSimulation
Launch →
GBM Path Simulator
Simulate Geometric Brownian Motion price paths. Custom drift μ, volatility σ, time horizon T and path count.
GBMStochasticCanvas
Launch →
⟨σ⟩
Heston Stochastic Vol
Stochastic variance model. Compare GBM vs Heston paths — see volatility clustering emerge in real time.
HestonVol ClusteringStochastic
Launch →
𝒜
Bachelier (ABM) Model
Arithmetic Brownian Motion option pricing for non-lognormal assets. Compares with Black-Scholes across the strike range.
BachelierABMFixed Income
Black-Scholes Option Pricer
Aeon Nimbus · BlackScholesCall / BlackScholesPut ↗
C = S·N(d₁) − K·e^(−rT)·N(d₂)  |  d₁ = [ln(S/K) + (r + σ²/2)T] / (σ√T)  |  d₂ = d₁ − σ√T
Spot Price S
Strike K
Time T (years)
Risk-free Rate r (%)
Implied Volatility σ (%)
Call Price
per share
Put Price
per share
Intrinsic (C)
max(S−K, 0)
Put-Call Check
C−P = S−PV(K)
Option Greeks
Spot S
Strike K
T (years)
Rate r (%)
Vol σ (%)
Paths N
Option Type
Barrier Level
MC Price
per share
95% CI ±
conf. interval
BS Reference
vanilla benchmark
Paths
simulated
Monte Carlo prices converge as N→∞. Use 10,000+ paths for stable estimates. Binary and barrier options are path-dependent — each step must be simulated individually.
GBM Path Simulator
Aeon Nimbus · GeometricBrownianMotion ↗
dS = μ·S·dt + σ·S·dW  ⟹  S(t) = S₀ · exp[(μ − σ²/2)t + σ√t · Z]  where Z ~ N(0,1)
Initial Price S₀
Drift μ (annual %)
Volatility σ (annual %)
Time Horizon T (years)
Number of Paths
Expected E[S_T]
Simulated Mean
Simulated Std
P(S_T > S₀)
Heston Stochastic Volatility
Aeon Nimbus · StochasticVarianceModel ↗
dS = μS dt + √v·S dW₁  |  dv = κ(θ−v)dt + ξ√v dW₂  |  corr(dW₁, dW₂) = ρ  |  Feller: 2κθ > ξ²
Price S₀
Drift μ (%)
Init. Variance v₀ (%²)
Long-run Var θ (%²)
Mean Reversion κ
Vol of Vol ξ
Correlation ρ
Time T (years)
Heston paths GBM (const. vol)
Heston model produces realistic volatility clustering — paths spread and contract in bursts, unlike constant-vol GBM. Negative ρ creates the leverage effect: falling prices → rising volatility.
Bachelier (ABM) Option Model
Aeon Nimbus · ArithmeticBrownianMotion ↗
dS = μ dt + σ_B dW  (additive)  |  C_Bach = (F−K)·N(d) + σ_B√T·n(d)  |  d = (F−K)/(σ_B√T)
Forward / Spot F
Strike K
Time T (years)
Bachelier Vol σ_B (absolute)
BS Vol σ_BS (%) for comparison
Bachelier Call
Bachelier Put
BS Call (ref)
Delta (Bachelier)
Bachelier (ABM) allows negative prices — suitable for negative interest rates or spread options. For ATM: Bachelier vol ≈ BS vol × S₀. Used in SABR model calibration for rates markets.
All tools are for educational and informational purposes only. Not financial advice. Results are model-based estimates only.
Proprietary Systematic Research

Quantitative Strategies

Twelve fully systematic strategies across systematic equity, FX, and commodities — institutional-grade algorithmic systems backtested on 99–100% real tick data across 12+ years of full market cycles.

Systematic Equity Strategies · 7 Models · Backtested 2006–2026
Strategy Type CAGR Sharpe Max DD Vol Risk
KAIROS Market neutral L/S 13.10% 1.18 15.02% 11.09% Low Reports →
KRONOS Dual-momentum rotation 20.54% 1.00 25.43% 20.57% Moderate Reports →
AEGIS Market timing 14.01% 1.08 15.61% 12.81% Moderate Reports →
BOREAS Trend following 18.17% 1.04 23.55% 17.55% Moderate Reports →
PROTEUS Double layer 16.83% 1.07 18.23% 15.74% Moderate Reports →
TYPHON Market timing + risk 44.79% 1.12 42.10% 39.32% High Reports →
EREBUS Double layer + risk 54.38% 1.14 48.30% 48.40% High Reports →
KAIROS
Market Neutral Long/Short · Low risk
13.10%
CAGR
1.18
Sharpe
15.02%
Max DD
KRONOS
Dual-Momentum Rotation · Moderate risk
20.54%
CAGR
1.00
Sharpe
25.43%
Max DD
AEGIS
Market Timing · Moderate risk
14.01%
CAGR
1.08
Sharpe
15.61%
Max DD
BOREAS
Trend Following · Moderate risk
18.17%
CAGR
1.04
Sharpe
23.55%
Max DD
PROTEUS
Double Layer · Moderate risk
16.83%
CAGR
1.07
Sharpe
18.23%
Max DD
TYPHON
Market Timing + Risk · High risk
44.79%
CAGR
1.12
Sharpe
42.10%
Max DD
EREBUS
Double Layer + Risk · Very High risk
54.38%
CAGR
1.14
Sharpe
48.30%
Max DD

* Annualised figures. Historical backtested performance 2006–2026. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. These are quantitative research models, not investment advice or financial recommendations.

FX & Commodities · Proprietary Systematic · 99–100% Real Tick Data · 2013–2025 · 12,262 Combined Trades
Pair Type Sharpe LR Corr Max DD Win Rate Profit Factor Recovery Trades Tick Quality
USD / JPYTrend Following 2.130.90 15.83%39.6%1.299.68×3,163 99%
XAU / USDMean Reversion 1.820.96 15.54%51.2%1.225.86×2,908 99%
EUR / JPYTrend Following 2.200.90 16.35%48.3%1.205.68×2,174 99%
GBP / USDMean Reversion 2.310.97 23.76%49.4%1.122.67×2,037 99%
EUR / USDTrend Following 1.910.93 34.52%44.6%1.184.63×1,980 100%
USD / JPY
Trend Following
Foreign Exchange · 99% Ticks · 2013–2025
2.13
Sharpe
0.90
LR Corr
15.83%
Max DD
39.6%
Win Rate
1.29
Prof. Factor
3,163
Trades
XAU / USD
Mean Reversion
Commodities · 99% Ticks · 2013–2025
1.82
Sharpe
0.96
LR Corr
15.54%
Max DD
51.2%
Win Rate
1.22
Prof. Factor
2,908
Trades
EUR / JPY
Trend Following
Foreign Exchange · 99% Ticks · 2013–2025
2.20
Sharpe
0.90
LR Corr
16.35%
Max DD
48.3%
Win Rate
1.20
Prof. Factor
2,174
Trades
GBP / USD
Mean Reversion
Foreign Exchange · 99% Ticks · 2013–2025
2.31
Sharpe
0.97
LR Corr
23.76%
Max DD
49.4%
Win Rate
1.12
Prof. Factor
2,037
Trades
EUR / USD
Trend Following
Foreign Exchange · 100% Ticks · 2013–2025
1.91
Sharpe
0.93
LR Corr
34.52%
Max DD
44.6%
Win Rate
1.18
Prof. Factor
1,980
Trades

Backtested on 99–100% real tick data (MetaTrader 5) — the highest fidelity available in institutional-grade simulation. Results use proportional position sizing (fixed % risk per trade). 12,262 combined trades across a full 12-year cycle (2013–2025) spanning COVID, the 2022–2023 JPY intervention cycle, and multiple rate regimes. Backtested results do not guarantee future performance. Full methodology and walk-forward analysis available to qualified institutional allocators upon request.

Build Your Ideal Portfolio

Simulate allocations across all 12 proprietary strategies — 7 systematic equity models and 5 FX/commodity systems. Assign weights and compute the blended risk-adjusted profile. Wtd. Sharpe and Max DD span all strategies; Eq. CAGR and Eq. Vol are equity-weighted metrics (scaled to your equity allocation).

Total Allocation 0%

Educational tool only. Simulated results based on historical backtested data. Not investment advice.

Portfolio Metrics
CAGR
Total Return
Sharpe
Sortino
Max DD
Calmar
Volatility
Win Rate
Profit Factor
Best Week
Worst Week
Metrics computed from the blended simulated equity curve. Real portfolio performance will differ due to inter-strategy correlation and sequence risk.
Weekly Quantitative Reports

In-depth quantitative research for each strategy — weekly reports covering the mathematical framework, model developments, portfolio movements, and quantitative reasoning behind each strategy's evolution.

AI Agent Compatible · Structured for Programmatic Consumption

Reports are structured as machine-readable research briefs. Feed them directly into your AI agent pipeline, LLM workflow, or systematic monitoring system. Each report delivers consistent JSON-compatible structured data: signals, model state, portfolio moves, and quantitative rationale — designed for both human reading and agent ingestion.

🔥 60 subs
KRONOS
Dual-Momentum Rotation
Ray Dalio quantitative market regime detector & Trend Following — weekly quantitative research report.
ETFs & Funds · Nasdaq · S&P 500 · Commodities · Bonds
🔥 52 subs
AEGIS
Market Timing · Macro Protection
Macro strategy and protection — weekly quantitative research report.
ETFs & Funds · Sector ETFs · Index Funds · Fixed Income
🔥 34 subs
KAIROS
Long-Short Momentum
Market neutral long-short momentum — weekly quantitative research report.
US Equities · Large & Mid Cap Stocks
BOREAS
Multi-Factor Equity
Multi-factor equity selection — weekly quantitative research report.
US Equities · Multi-Factor Stock Selection
TYPHON
Market Timing + High Return
Macro strategy and high returns — weekly quantitative research report.
ETFs & Funds · Cross-Asset Macro · Equities · Rates · FX
EREBUS
Macro + Volatility Trading
Macro strategy and volatility trading — weekly quantitative research report.
ETFs & Funds · Volatility Products · Index Options
PROTEUS
Double Layer Macro + Vol
Macro strategy and volatility trading — weekly quantitative research report.
ETFs & Funds · Options on Major Indices & ETFs
⚠ These reports are for informational and educational purposes only. They describe the quantitative methodology, mathematical models, and portfolio evolution of each strategy. They do NOT constitute trading signals, investment advice, or personalized financial recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always conduct your own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Past performance does not guarantee future results. These are quantitative research models only. Not investment advice.
Portfolio & Products

Fund Lab

Three vehicles for research, capital allocation and quantitative tooling.

Paper Fund · Multi-Asset
Asset Allocation
Dynamic Fund
A macro-driven paper portfolio rebalancing dynamically across seven asset classes. Equity, fixed income, gold, EM and commodities with regime-aware sizing.
+28.4%Since Inception
1.31Sharpe Ratio
−8.2%Max Drawdown
View Fund →
Systematic · Equity & FX
Systematic
Strategies
A library of 12 proprietary quantitative strategies spanning momentum, mean-reversion and macro regimes across US equities and global FX pairs.
12Active Strategies
2Asset Classes
Explore Strategies →
Interactive · Analyst Toolkit
Quant
Tools
Live analyst toolkit — DCF models, options pricing, Monte Carlo, factor analytics and more. Every tool a PM or research desk expects fluency in, open to all.
12+Live Models
Open Toolkit →
Get In Touch

Let's Talk

Interested in research, quantitative strategies, collaborations, or hiring opportunities? I typically respond within 24–48 hours.

Opens your email client to send
Contact Methods

Use the form for detailed enquiries. For quick professional contact, LinkedIn is the fastest channel.

Availability
Open to research collaborations
Open to institutional enquiries
Considering full-time roles
Selective on advisory roles
Equity
Read on Substack ↗
Ticker
Direction
Entry
Target
Stop
Size
Horizon